[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: three impacts at the K-T boundary
>From: "Mike Hoffmann" <Mike.Hoffmann@mch.sni.de>
>> An additional thought - consider the scale of some of the Jupiter strikes.
>> Many of them were vastly more powerful than anything which struck during
>> the Phanerozoic (540 Mya to the present). If just one of the larger of
>> them had struck the Earth, it would have produced a crater which extends
>> from Washington, D.C. to New York City, and probably have boiled the oceans
>> to a vapor in the process. So much for multicellular life...
>I think I remember it discussed that the SL9 impacts would have not hit as
>violently on Earth as they had on Jupiter: apparently simple physics, with
>Jupiter accelerating the chunks to a *lot* higher velocities.
>The size of the SL9 "rocks" by themselves would fit the regular K-T strike
>theory quite well. Sorry, meaning a *multiple* strike theory.
Hmm, then we're a little safer...
In any case, here are the references I mentioned:
Meyerhoff, A.A., J.B. Lyons, and C.B. Officer. 1994. Chicxulub Structure:
A volcanic sequence of Late Cretaceous age. Geology (forgot to check
volume number, but is the current 1994 volume):3-4.
Izett, G.A., W.A. Cobban, J.D. Obradovich, and M.J. Kunk. 1993. The
Manson impact structure: 40Ar/39Ar age and its distal impact ejecta in the
Pierre Shale in southeastern South Dakota. Science 262:729-732.
As for Deccan stratigraphy, look for almost any paper on Indian
geology/paleontology/stratigraphy about the "intertrappen" beds.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist in Exile
U.S. Geological Survey
Branch of Paleontology & Stratigraphy
MS 970 National Center
Reston, VA 22092