[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
>> Nanotyrannus lancensis (Gilmore 1946) late Maastrichtian, western North
>> (?= juvenile T. rex?)
> I was pretty convinced that this individual was an adult. Why then
>the doubts about the validity of this taxon?
I myself haven't seen the actual specimen to vouch for its ontogenetic age.
Bakker et al. stated that most of the cranial sutures are fused,
suggesting a relatively advanced growth stage. However, Carpenter (1992)
failed to find any unique characters in this specimen that are not found in
Tyrannosaurus, and suggested that it may just be a growth stage. Either
sounds reasonable to me.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist in Exile Phone: 703-648-5280
U.S. Geological Survey FAX: 703-648-5420
Branch of Paleontology & Stratigraphy
MS 970 National Center
Reston, VA 22092