[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


Tom Holtz mentioned a study by Creisler which showed that the generic name
_Centrosaurus_ was not preoccupied and was thus valid for the centrosaurine
ceratopsian. The only paper by Creisler that I know of was the one on
_Monoclonius_ and the etymology of Cope's dinosaurs published in JVP in 1992.
No mention of this is made in this paper. Is the study which you referred
to been published, and if not could you elaborate on the current situation
of this taxon, Tom?