[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: ceratopsians and administrivia
> Tom Holtz writes:
> >Chasmosaurine [aka ceratopsine] ceratopsids like Triceratops,
> >Torosaurus, etc., come in two adult morphologies:
> In his chapter in _Dinosaur Systematics_, doesn't Lehman also
> tentatively suggest that Torosaurus might be the male form of
> Triceratops? If I'm remembering correctly, has anybody agreed with or
> disputed that assessment?
I checked the book, and it's Ostrom and Wellnhofer, in their chapter on
Triceratops, that make this statement (p. 251):
_Torosaurus_ may in fact represent a separate taxon, a distinct
genus, but it might also be the male form of _Triceratops_.
As you said, it's very tentative.