[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Court Sidesteps Dinosaur Ownership Dispute
Thanks Ron for keeping us abreast of these developments.
This excerpt caught my attention:
On Mon, 3 Oct 1994, Ron Baalke wrote:
> [balance of article deleted for brevity]
> Government lawyers urged the justices to reject the appeal. They noted
> that one expert had estimated the dinosaur's worth at several million
> dollars, and that another called it "priceless."
Why should the "estimated worth" have any bearing on the legality of the
case? Is this just the media's focus on worth and was really immaterial
to this case?
Information Highway Worker
University of Washington