[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On Fri. 21 April, Peter Sheehan wrote:
> The problem is that William's statement about the decline has no evidence
> to back it up. Personally, I have seen no evidence presented that there
> was a
> gradual decline of dinosaurs at any scale in the Hell Creek. In fact,
> the only field study of the Hell Creek designed to test the hypothesis
> rejected a gradual decline.
A quick search of my database turned up TWO papers on this subject
directly relating to the Hell Creek. One suggests a gradual extinction,
and the other a "catastrophic" extinction. (I suppose any extinction
would be "catastrophic" if you happen to be in the species involved.) :-)
J. Smit & S. Van der Kaars, 1984, Terminal Cretaceous extinctions in the
Hell creek area, Montana: Compatible with catastrophic extinctions,
R.E. Sloan, J.K. Rigby Jr., L.M. Van Valen, D. Gabriel, 1986, Gradual
dinosaur extinction and simultaneous ungulate radiation in the Hell Creek
Formation, Science 232:629-633
There are also comments on the Sloan et al. paper in Science 234, pp
1172-3 by L.J. Bryant et al.
I haven't read any of these papers, but I thought I'd throw a
little fuel on the fire.