[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Inquiring Minds
Tim Madden <TMADDEN@medicode.mhs.compuserve.com> wrote:
>Bakker does have some good questions. Why do the number of fossils
>taper off as you get near the time of impact? Shouldn't a graph of
>the fossils show a spike near the estimated time of impact? Why didn't
>ALL species die out?
If the impact and extinctions are related you wouldn't *necessarily* have
to have a "corpse-count" spike at the iridium boundary. The reason that a
"spike" isn't required in the scenario has to do with statistics:
preservation statistics, population statistics, sampling statistics, etc.
For a good summary of the whole debate, look at a short paper by
Mike Williams in the Journal of Paleontology, v. 68, no.2, year 1994. He
does a good job of re-hashing and summarizing all of the extinction
expert's research up to 1994.
(really funky drawings, too!) :-)