[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On Wed, 16 Aug 1995 DPterosaur@aol.com wrote:
> David Carlisle writes:
> <<[Lebedev and Coates] conclude that batrachiomorphs (Amphibia) and
> Reptiliomorphs (everything else of land vertebrates) are sister groups and
> that the latter did not evolve from the former. >>
> Where do they place _Diadectes_, gephyrostegids, _Limnoscelis_, and other
> tetrapods close to amniotes?
These taxa are basal reptiliomorphs and are thus outgroups to the
Amniota. The term "amphibia" has been redefined to include those
tetropods more closely related to modern amphibians (Lissamphibia) than
to amniotes. Hence the above mentioned taxa are not amphibians in the
strict sense even though some of them (at least) possesed the "amphibian"
(primitive) mode of reproduction (ie. aquatic eggs and larvae).