[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Birds and dinosaurs
Please do not make the mistake of equating phylogenetic
systematics (cladistics) and Linnaean taxonomy. The two are very
different in both process and aim. Cladistics deals with theory of
evolutionary history, and has only a secondary application to taxonomy.
Linnaean taxonomy is the process of naming biological groups. It makes no
assumptions, nor is it dictated by evolutionary history (at least it
never has been).
Now whether naming of organisms SHOULD be done in a phylogenetic
context is a different argument better taken up in a different forum...
On Mon, 7 Aug 1995 Dinogeorge@aol.com wrote:
> If you're a cladist, then birds ARE dinosaurs. If you're a Linnaean or
> Mayrian taxonomist, then birds merely descended from dinosaurs.
> But if you want to be even MORE correct, you of course should say either (1)
> dinosaurs are birds (cladistic version), or (2) dinosaurs descended from
> [dino]-birds (Linnaean version); the Birds Came First (BCF).
> Pushing-his-own-version George