[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Systematics (was: Greg Paul, Theropods...)
>Well... I guess I am one of the few that still use the Linnean system
>at least part of the time...
I have no objection to the Linnean scheme as such, except for its
potentially confusing nomenclature, e.g. if Vertebrata is a subphylum
of Chordata, and Tetrapoda is an infraphylum, and Endosauropsida,
Theropsida, etc. are superclasses, then are the Amniotes a
subinfraphylum or a superduperclass? :)
>I do not use reptiles at all.
Good for you! For my part, I only use the term "reptile" to
describe people I hate. :)
>I use Synapsida for cold-blooded synapsids;
>Mammalia for warm-blooded synapsids (ie mammals + therapsids);
>Anapsida for anapsids; Lepidosauria for lizards, snakes tuaturas and
>such; Eusuchia for cold-blooded archosaurs; and Aves for
>warm-blooded archosaurs (ie ornithodira or endosauropsida). That's
>just me however and just like always I'm sure that no support will be
>gained from the list because most of y'all tend not to like my
>systematics. I would put Plesiosaurs and Icthiosaurs and the like
>tentatively in the Lepidosauria.
Your systematics make sense to ME! I would only use "Endosauropsida"
( one of my favorite "megawords" :) ) for the warm-blooded archosaurs,
containing the orders Pterosauria, Pseudosuchia(?), Theropoda,
Sauropodomorpha, Ornithopoda, Thyreophora, Marginocephalia, and Aves.