[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: BADD BCF
>The first question I would ask is, does this surface serve as an airfoil in
>extant birds (it's hard to tell, because it's covered with feathers)? The
>second question is, do the patagial tensor muscles help draw the wing back
>during a wingbeat? My guess is that the patagium is one of those features
>that evolved as an adjunct to gliding or powered flight, because it seems t=
>restrictive for a strictly climbing or grasping forelimb.
Yes to your first question. As a part of my Ornithology class, I dissected=
a pigeon. When you remove the feathers, there is a noticable airfoil shape=
to the wing.
No to your second question. The patagial muscles are a separate entity from=
the biceps, which do serve to draw the wing back.
>A most interesting anatomical feature, by the way. I wonder whether
>dromaeosaurids and other maniraptorans retained one.
Assuming BCF is correct, I would have to say no, since it would probably be=
incorporated into the biceps. The patagial muscles force the arm to be=
held in a perminant V, a major disadvantage for any predator (you would=
have to explain the loss of the patagium in BCF, by the way).