[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, Dave Hardenbrook wrote:
> Thomas R. Holtz <Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu> wrote:
> >Yeah, I'm kind of puzzled by the rhynchosaurs and prolacertians in there,
> Are thought rhynchosaurs were now definitely in the archosauromorphs, as
> was _Tanystropheus_...
> -- Dave
> P.S. What are prolacertians?
lacertians that have lost their amateur status.
(I am truly sorry, I was simply unable to resist. I am usually
above such things...)