[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Archosauromorphs?

On Fri, 15 Dec 1995, Dave Hardenbrook wrote:

> Thomas R. Holtz <Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu> wrote:
> >Yeah, I'm kind of puzzled by the rhynchosaurs and prolacertians in there,
> >too.
> Are thought rhynchosaurs were now definitely in the archosauromorphs, as
> was _Tanystropheus_...
>                              -- Dave
> P.S. What are prolacertians?

        lacertians that have lost their amateur status.

        (I am truly sorry, I was simply unable to resist. I am usually 
above such things...)

        -nick L.