[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
In a message dated 95-12-15 12:30:53 EST, Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu (th81)
>>Are thought rhynchosaurs were now definitely in the archosauromorphs, as
>They are definitley in there: they just don't have the otherwise interesting
>archosaur "gestalt" for me, but I'm biased.
>(The clade with the interesting archosaur "gestalt" is Archosauriformes,
>actually. These other Triassic weirdies branched off earlier, it seems).
Archosaur _Gestalt_? Was ist das? (Actually, I think I know what you mean.
_Mesenosaurus_ always had the archosaur _Gestalt_ to me.)