[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Archaeopteryx and Flight
>The point is, why did the flycatching pterosaurs die out? That
>life style is quite viable still, and has been since about the
>Carboniferous. it is not as if all pterosurs were in one lineage.
>Just because the Pteranodontid and Dsungapterid lineages shifted
>to fish eating and scavenging respectively is no reason for the
>Pterodactylid lineage to die out!
My question is: how can we be so sure this happened? Flycatching pterosaurs
(or birds) are likely to be small, delicate and forest-dwelling, and our
fossil record of whatever occupied this particular niche may be very spotty,
dependent on specialized conditions such as those at Solnhofen. The
best-known Cretaceous fossil birds were fish-eaters too (the hesperornithids
and ichthyornithids). I realize that Sereno and others are now finding
smaller terrestrial Cretaceous fossil birds like Sinornis, but can we be
sure that pterosaur ecological equivalents to pterosaurs like Anurognathus
(say) were truly absent?
Ronald I. Orenstein Phone: (905) 820-7886 (home)
International Wildlife Coalition Fax/Modem: (905) 569-0116 (home)
Home: 1825 Shady Creek Court Messages: (416) 368-4661
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 3W2 Internet: firstname.lastname@example.org
Office: 130 Adelaide Street W., Suite 1940 Compuserve ID: 72037,2513
Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3P5