[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
I went to Dr. Bakker's lecture last Friday here in Portland, Or. He promotes
the disease theory of the K-T boundary. I still don't find it reasonable, and
would like to hear from someone who either promotes the theory or at least
understands it. My problem with the theory is two-fold. First, there is the
issue of spreading the disease. There are three continental islands where the
die-off is, presumable, simultaneous with the rest of the land masses, namely
Australia, India, and Antartica. How is the simultaneaty of the die-off
believed to have occurred.
The second part is the vastness of Dinosauria. I don't recall whether this
is a sub-class or a super-order, or what. The point is that there are many
different species of dinosaur alive. It would be hard to imagine a disease
that affects all mammals, even less so given that it would be fatal and spread
rapidly across the world (without jet travel! :-) ).
I have a second question - easier...
What is the plural of archaeopterix?