[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Neil & Nessie?
> >Any of the above and items promoting the development of tourism >in the Loch
> Ness area do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this
Before I answer this, please let me apologise for sending the Fortey
on Granites massage to the dinosaur list, I sent it to the wrong
list.....sorry, sorry, sorry 3'*(
> Ok Neil, you brought it up and I've been dying to ask: What ARE your
> beliefs about the "Loch Ness Monster"? What, in your educated opinion, is
> going on there?
I believe that there is definitely something there. Plesiosaur? NO!
Dinosaur? NO! NO! NO!
Fish? Seal? Otter? YES!.....perhaps. I have not seen any evidence to
suggest that there is an outrageously large animal in the loch. If
it were a fish rather than a mammal (or reptile), that would explain
the lack of sightings. If it were a land mammal, that too would
explain the small number of sightings. I think that the sightings
that are made are due to a variety of causes. I don't believe that
you can pin all of the sightings to one source animal as many appear
to be doing. The 'monster' beliefs arise from the attempt to do just
that. Trying to imagine what sort of animal could cause all the
different types of sightings. I would like to say that I can pass
all sightings to particular animals or plain hallucination, but I
can't. I am not a marine/fresh water zoologist, but I think that I
can safely stick my head on the block and say that there is no way
a plesiosaur, or a dinosaur, lives in Loch Ness. There I've said it,
and will probably be damned by the Scottish tourist board now.
PS I remember someone saying that the 'monster' could not be a
sturgeon because no caviar had been found in the loch.