[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


> Just picking up bones loses most of the information available with them.
> Their ultimate value thus is reduced greatly.  This practice, which not
> all commercial collectors stoop to, sacrifices knowledge for ephemeral
> financial gain.  Not a good trade in the long run.

     Paleontologists are trying to put together a big comprehensive 
picture of 
the history of life on earth, and to do that the context of any fossil is 
mandatory.  Jerry mentioned Dyscolocosaurus (sp?) in a recent posting.  
This sauropod was reported by the collector as coming from the Lance formation
although it is likely in fact from the Morrison.  However, the 
uncertainty prevents us from putting in its evolutionary context, and 
thus rounding out our understanding of saurpod evolution.  Is it a new 
diplodocid genus from the Morrison or a (VERY) late Cretaceous survivor?  
The information this fossil could give us if we were certain of its 
context is lost.  Its kind of like if someone told you there was a dude 
named Thomas Jefferso who stood about yeah big, had a ponytail, and lived 
in a really nice house, but neglected to mention when he lived or his 
part in the War of Independance of the development of American government.     

LN Jeff