[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Re: There Be Dragons
>From: Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu (th81)
> > From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > >You call hundreds of eyewitness accounts insuffiecient evidence?!
> > Yes. Hundreds of eyewitnesses have seen Elvis walking the halls of
> > K-Marts across America, but that doesn't invalidate the conclusions
> > of his death certificate. I used to be into cryptozoology, ancient
> > astronauts, etc., until I came to an important discovery: people lie.
>And even more important, people make mistakes.
>I once saw a flying saucer. At least that is what my mind saw.
>A few minutes investigations proved it to be a bird (a nighthawk
>to be precise).
Yes, but can we truly say that every sighting of MM was a mistake or a lie?
>A quick glimpse of a largish animal out in the middle of a featureless
>expanse of water can be easily mistaken for something truly unusual.
>And Loch Ness has one of the largest races of otter in Europe.
Oh, comeon. An otter is a tiny animal compared to the sizes reported for
the Loch monster. Besides, many repots report the distinct absensce of hair.