[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Would I be correct in thinking that this beast was originaly named from a
single horn which had been disturbed and was found in sediments much younger
than those in which it had been originaly fossilized-this led Marsh to
belive it could not be a dinosaur. He identified it as a species of extinct
bison-hence the name-I belive the animal turned out to be a horned dinosaur.
Anyone know if this is correct?