[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
> True species identification cannot be based on morphology alone, nor can
> morphology predict common ancestral states in a phylogenetic analysis.
> Genetic sequences can do this, and as technology progresses, like it is in
> our lab, the burden will largely be on the morphologists to reconcile their
> data with the genetic data.
Even if someone someday comes up with a complete dinosaur DNA
strand, this is not going to help much with dinosaur taxonmy.
Even assuming the dinosaur species of the DNA can somehow be identified,
maybee by cloning or whatever, there will be no other dinosaur DNA strands from
other species to compare it to. Genetic material from extinct organisms
isn't happened across that frequently, certainly not as frequently as
dinosaur fossils, and no one has proven that any DNA taken from insects
in Mesozoic amber belongs to dinosaurs as far as I know. Osteology is
all paleontologists have to go on to determine species as horribly
uncertain as it may be, and unless a miricle happens it probably
always will be.