[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Feathers vs. tryosseus cannal
In a message dated 95-10-16 08:32:26 EDT, NINO@vm1.sdi.uam.es (Nino) writes:
>There is other problem. Why you suposse that the birds without a tryosseus
>al couldn't flight actively? Ok, they couldn't flight as well as those whose
>ve it, but probably they could flight well enough to move around.
Absolutely right. The canal and the associated shift of the m.
supracoracoideus is an evolutionary improvement to a pre-existing volant