[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
> Can anyone tell me what argument, if any, Bakker uses on behalf of his
position that Brontosaurus is actually the correct name?
Bakker makes the point that Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus were both
named by Marsh (or was it Cope? errrrgh!), and that it is therefore doing
him no disservice to use the more familiar name. Since Brontosaurus is more
familiar to the public (he argues) there is no harm is keeping this name.
Personally, I use "Apatosaurus", mainly because I have been hearing
and using it for almost as long during my (very short) adult life as I was
hearing "Brontosaurus" when I was little. I think children today are at least
as familiar with "Apatosaurus" as "Brontosaurus", even if thier parents