[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Field Museum redux
On Fri, 1 Sep 1995, Ellin Beltz wrote:
> As far as the teaching of "creation science" or mentioning it in the
> classroom before or after evolution... My personal opinion (and I expect
> to be flamed for it) is that --everything-- relating to evolution should
> be taught. The arguments for and the arguments against (no matter how
> absurd) deserve a place in the dialog. Censorship of ideas (no matter
> how absurd they are) is --wrong--.
> Let the students hear all sides. If the bio teacher is a good one, the
> arguments in favor vs. the arguments against should resolve themselves in
> the students' minds leaving them more capable of rational thought,
> logical discussion, and an interest in learning.
> Controversy is an excellent teacher's aide. It makes the subject matter
> far more interesting than "here it is, this is fact, now - regurgitate!"
No no no no no no no. No. Creationism is pseudo science, pure and simple.
Not to be taught as an alternate point of view. This is not a
philosophy discourse, where many points of view can co-exist. Science
is taught on a foundation of facts derived by research and experimentation.
I've yet to see a creationist experiment.
If creationism appears in the classroom at all, it should be in the
role of pseudo science, as an endeavor to make facts fit a foregone
+----------+ Rich Travsky RTRAVSKY @ UWYO . EDU
| | Division of Information Technology
| | University of Wyoming (307) 766 - 3663 / 3668
| UW | "Wyoming is the capital of Denver." - a tourist
| * | "One of those square states." - another tourist