[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Blood flow in Sauropods
> At 12:05 AM 9/14/95, Derek Tearne wrote:
> >The reason which I have heard cited is that mammals are restricted to
> >7 vertebra in the neck and no mammal has more (although I knew a
> >woman once who had eight... ).
> >This pretty much restricts the length and flexibility of mammalian necks.
> >Birds, reptiles and dinoraus are not restricted in this way and
> >can therefore evolve much longer necks.
> I can't say i've heard this before -- just precisely what does
> "restricted" mean? Is this supposed to mean that it's physically
> impossible for mammals to evolve more (or less) than seven cervicals? How
> would one determine such a limit? After all, most of the long-necked
> sauropods have similar numbers of cervical vertebrae, except for
> _Mamenchisaurus_ (I'm not sure about other euhelopodids) which went and
> increased it from 12ish to 19. Under the proper selective potentials, I'd
> think that a mammal could and would do something similar.
Also, a giraffe doesn't exactly have a short neck. I imagine a
mammal could make a neck as long as it wanted, if it was willing to