[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Re Re re Jason



In a message dated 95-09-29 18:46:17 EDT, bervoets@nrc.nl (Fred Bervoets)
writes:

>TITANOSAURUS falotti Cretaceous Late 88.5 65 Unnamed unit, Khoueng, Laos
>Saurischia Sauropodomorpha Sauropoda Titanosauridae Herbivore Coniachian
>Santonian Campanian Maastrichtian      Hoffet,1942

The spelling is _Titanosaurus falloti_ (minor correction). Newly discovered
material (a complete hind limb and 30 caudal vertebrae) from Tang-Val, Laos
indicates that the species does not belong to the genus _Titanosaurus_ and
may represent a new genus (Taquet, Battail & DeJax, 1992).