[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Batch o refs



>From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
 > In a message dated 95-09-29 14:20:45 EDT, Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu (th81)
 > writes:
 > 
 > >Of course, if you add in parataxonomy, you can add dozens upon hundreds upon
 > >thousands upon... of additional parataxa for any one genus ...
 > 
 > But we don't DO this! We exercise some restraint (a term certain cladists
 > might want to become familiar with).
 > 
Or, as I put it to myself: why would we *want* to??

swf@elsegundoca.attgis.com              sarima@netcom.com

The peace of God be with you.