[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]


>Darrren wrote:
>>Is anyone aware of any Maastichtian sauropod remains, particularly from
>>Africa, SE Asia and Australia, that are not bog-standard titanosaurids?
>>Many thanks..
>NEMEGTOSAURUS mongoliensis Cretaceous Late 83 65 Nemegt Formation, Omnogov,
>Mongolian People's Republic    Saurischia Sauropodomorpha Sauropoda
>Diplodocidae Dicraeosaurinae ?Campanian Maastrichtian   Nowinski,1971
>OPISTHOCOELICAUDIA skarzinskii Cretaceous Late 83 65 Nemegt Formation,
>Xinjiang, Weiwuer Ziziqu, People's republic of China. Saurischia
>Sauropodomorpha Sauropoda Camarasauridae Opisthocoelicaudiinae  ?Campanian
>Maastrichtian Borsuk-Bialynicka,1977

> I couldn't find anything from Australia or Africa in my dbase.

Well, these are both Eastern Asia, and not Southeastern, but that's
alright.  Also, the Nemegt seems to be early Campanian, while the beds in
Nanxiang may be the only latest Maastricthian beds in Asia, and do not
contain sauropods.

Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist
Dept. of Geology
University of Maryland
College Park, MD  20742
Email:Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu (th81)
Fax: 301-314-9661