[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
In a message dated 95-09-25 22:33:13 EDT, you write:
>I would like to say that I think that Giganotosaurus was a poorly chosen
>purely because of the fact that it sounds so much like Gigantosaurus, it
>would sort-of be like someone naming an Allosaur BrontUsaurus or something;
>it's just too confusing.
Agreed, I also think the genus name_Carnotaurus_ was another unimmaginative
name! Come to think of it, I didn't like Bakkers _Drinker_ either!
>Also, imperitor would definately be better than carolinii. Let's all rename
>it _Caroliniraptor imperitor_ (ya, ya, I know we can't do that). Just for
>future reference, I will NEVER EVER put "saurus" in any dinosaur name I
>invent, not ever!
What's wrong with "saurus"?
Thomas R. Lipka