[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: A piece of the bolide?
In a message dated 96-04-09 13:59:54 EDT, you write:
>I believe that the angle of impact has little to do with crater
>symetry. (Looka t he moon or any other celestial body that is well
>cratered. Do you think all of those craters were formed from
>straigh in impacts?). I have a remote memory of Shoemaker
>performing some experiments on this issue years ago. Temeber it is
>not the impact fo the object that digs out the crater, but the
>tremedous release of energy that radiates unifomly from the site
>that does most of the cratering.
I recently picked up a copy of Melosh's "Impact Cratering" and eventhough I
have not read it yet because I am still catching up on journals and a book
that came first, I do seem to remember my eye catching a similar remark about
the angle of impact vs crater size and symmetry while glimpsing at the pages.
At least up to a critical angle. Witness the geologically recent multiple
impacts in Argentina, the impact scars are _elongated_ and do not
superficially resemble your basic crater! I guess I'll have to check now ;-)
Thomas R. Lipka