[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On Mon, 22 Apr 1996, King, Norm wrote:
> >As far as I know, _Coelophysis_ itself has not been identified at
> >Ghost Ranch (except by Colbert and those who agree with him, of
> Wait a minute! Colbert identified it there FIRST, and that's what it was
> called for decades! "Except by...those who agree with him," you say.
> But there were ONLY people who agreed with him for over 40 years!
Yes, Colbert referred the Ghost Ranch animals to _Coelophysis_, but he
did not name the genus, nor was the type material of _Coelophysis_ found
at Ghost Ranch.
> >Bob Sullivan is working on a new diagnosis for _Coelophysis_ that
> >distinguishes it from the Ghost Ranch theropods.
> He could just as easily formulate a diagnosis to make all of the Ghost
> Ranch theropods into _Coelophysis_.
Not if they really are different animals!
> Norman R. King
Pacific Lutheran University
Tacoma, WA 98447