[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Different take on BCF
At 14:10 3/12/96 -0500, Tracy Ford wrote:
>No, the problem is assuming that birds evloved along only one line.
>Both Enantiornithine and Ornithiane birds are known from the Early
>Cretaceous. Since both are known, there are two different lines of
>birds in the Early Cretaceous. The line couldn't produce both birds
>from only one line. It's impossible.
No, it's not impossible, you're wrong. You can have just a line from
_Archaeopteryx_ (the most primitive bird we knows about) to some kind of
primitive bird/s, the Ornithothoraces (like _Iberomesornis_), and then, a
dichotomy, with the Enantiornithes in one branch and the Ornithurae in the
other one. What's the problem with that? I can't see it (you can read the
Chiappe's paper in Nature about the first 85 million years of avian evolution).
Bernardino P. Perez-Moreno Fax: 34-1-3978344
Unidad de Paleontologia E-mail: Nino@uam.es
Departamento de Biologia Phone: 34-1-3978139
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
28049 - Madrid