[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RE: _T. rex_ strikes ( was Ceratopsian frills)
>Weren't America's plains once overrun with millions of buffalo whose
>size made them fairly invulnerable to wolves?
wasn't size that protected buffalo-was shear numbers.
prairie wolves caught and killed solitaire buffalo-just as modern wolves
can kill the even-larger-than-a-buffalo moose.
>It's the "battleships" I wonder about. By the process of elimination,
>some say _T rex_ was a scavenger, driving hunters from carcasses. How?
>A lion can chase away smaller predators by swatting, lunging from a
>crouch, and turning fast. Was _T rex_ built for any of these things?
Lion isn't built for it either. Lions protect their kills from other
scavengers by out-numbering their major compettitors. One animal at a
time can protect the others from minor snatches for food from single
animals, but it takes the whole pride to run off competing hyenas or
>I think _T rex_ used impact because I don't see how it could have
>attacked like a wolf or like a tiger.
T rex is not built like a tiger or a wolf. We're talking biped not
quadraped. Why should it use a method developed by 4-legged animal s and
not use a method developed for a biped with big teeth (which may not HAVE
a modern equivalent to compare to)?
>I use _T rex_ as an example of an impact hunter because I don't have
>pictures and data for other tyrannosaurs. I think it was other
>tyrannosaurs, who appeared earlier, that specialized in sauropods.
According to Farlow, et all, T rex would kill itself doing so as an adult
with full mass and acceleration behind it. How do you see T rex managing