[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Quo vadis, T. rex? [long]
On Tue, 6 Feb 1996, Jeffrey Martz wrote:
> > Big assumption here, perhaps? If we assume T. rex is a maniraptoran
> > coelurosaur, does it not make sense that it would have had feathers of some
> > sort? THEN, perhaps, if a tyrannosaur walked by (nanotyrannus, perhaps,
> > since it was small enough to (perhaps) need insulation) they would say
> > "Whoa, that's a BIG bird! &%(&$%) (@&@ ^&$ @^_)*%(@&^)_^&(@&%@)!!!!!!"
> Assuming that any theropod except Archaeopteryx had feathers is a
> a much bigger assumption.
Although, if one really thinks about it, assuming that any theropod (or
any dinosaur) did *not* have feathers is just as big an assumption,
considering that all living dinosaurs do!
> LN Jeff
Pacific Lutheran University
Tacoma, WA 98447
"If you can't convince them, confuse them." -- Harry S. Truman