[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
>>In a message dated 96-02-07 09:32:08 EST, Thomas_R_HOLTZ@umail.umd.edu (th81)
>>>>This makes me _seriously_ doubt the proposed relationship between
>>>>and _Alvarezsaurus_. If they're going to be confamilial, they should at
>>>>have the same pedal structure, for Heaven's sake.
>>>Such as Hyracotherium and Equus?
>>I couldn't care less about _Hyracotherium_ and _Equus_.
>>But--don't tell me they're in the _same family_?!
>Actually they are not. Hyracotherium is a basal paleothere while the North
>American forms (usually called Hyracotherium or Eohippus or Protorohippus or
>???) are equids (so they probably aren't in the same "family")
That's right: I had heard about this "hyracothere plexus problem" (i.e.,
almost all basal perissodactyls are called "Hyracotherium", so it is a
Any chance that the type of Eohippus will turn out to be a basal equid?
Wouldn't that be nice!
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Dept. of Geology
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742