[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: your mail(frivilous-sorry Mickey)



>> 
>> Until something better comes along, I would consider "The 
>>Dinosauria"  to be the budding paleontologists if not the 
>>professional paleo-type's BIBLE. Just keep in mind that any or all 
>>of it may change without notice!
>
>Now I can't be completely sure, but I *believe* he meant that the 
>*clade Dinosauria* is not valid, not the book, _The Dinosauria_.
>

    Yup. I am pretty sure that I meant the clade and not the book. 
I'm inclined to agree that the book is not unlike a bible.

Later,
Cory Gross
Alberta Palaeontological Society
MRC Earth Sciences Society
gros4891@adc.mtroyal.ab.ca