[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Bird origin ref.
Adam Yates writes;
>Just got hold of a reprint of this ref. Welman, J. 1995. Euparkeria and
>the origin of birds. South African Journal of Science 91, 533-537.
>In this paper Welman compares the braincases of Euparkeria, Euskelosaurus
>Syntarsus and Sphenosuchus with those of birds. He found that
>the dinosaurs and sphenosuchus share derived characters not seen in
>either birds or Euparkeria and that there were some derived characters
>shared between Euparkeria and birds. He concluded that there was a sister
>group relationship between Euparkeria and Birds! Obviously the principle
>of total evidence was ignored.
This is Welman's interpretation of his data. Unfortunately, as scientists,=
we cannot just ignore this interpretation. We can take another look to see=
if there are other possible interpretations, but it must be added to the=
pile of work already done. Now, I want birds to be dinosaurs myself, but=
how do we make that fit with the information Welman offers. The real=
question I have is: does he see in birds the same features we see in=
theropods? One possible interpretation could be that the theropods are a=
distict lineage, separate from the ornithischians and sauropodomorphs (a=
point for BCF George).