[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Cladistic question (was synapomorphies)

David J. Froehlich writes;

>(I will use an example that has been used to
>ie bird/bat/pterosaur wings) we can hypothesize that wings are a shared
>derived feature for birds, bats and pterosaurs.  When we run the analysis (=
>enough information) we will end up with a topology that does not unite thes=
>three taxa.  Thus this is homoplasy not synapomorphy (but we could never
>have known
>this without the cladogram).

I'm not exactly clear, but surely there are other criteria on what animals=
 to include in a cladistic analysis.  I mean, one wouldn't try to build a=
 cladigram that included _Camptosaurus_ and _Dienonychus_, since the two are=
 clearly different from each other.  How do cladists decide what animals to=
 include in their studies?  And wouldn't this add an element of opinion into=
 the results, since the researcher would have to decide what animals to=
 include in the study?


"Don't Panic."