[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
On Thu, 15 Feb 1996, Graeme Worth wrote:
> Up until a couple of years ago at least, hadrosauridae was a single family.
> Recently I've seen a couple of phylogenies where Hadrosauridae and
> Lambeosauridae were used. What is the concensus (if any) on whether
> hadrosaurids and lambeosaurids are tribes or families, and on what basis?
The situation there was that there were claims made in the ?late 80s that
the hadrosaurs and the lambeosaurs had evolved from two different
iguanodont ancestors. To my knowledge, most researchers do not now
believe this. They could still be split into two families to emphasize
their distinctness, but this would leave several primitive hadrosaurs
without a family. It's more practical just to throw them all into one
I split advanced hadrosaurids into the following subfamilies:
Pacific Lutheran University
Tacoma, WA 98447
"If you can't convince them, confuse them." -- Harry S Truman