[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
> From: "D.W.Naish" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: ANKYLOSAUR CLUBS
>if Coombs' says that vertical flexibility was a no-no,
> is he dismissing Thulborn's hypothesis? Personally I was expecting Coombs to
> around what would be normal above-ground height of a hadrosaur head,
> and that's pretty high really.
err, I'm not familiar with this theory, but what is the point of a
heavily armoured animal, such as an anklyosaur, mimicking an
(apparently) defenseless animal such as a hadrosaur? This would only
encourage predators, surely?