[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dino Notes
In a message dated 96-01-10 17:26:10 EST, email@example.com (Paul
>Looking at the illustration on page 439 of the Dinosauria, I find it had to
>interpret this skull fragement as plesiosaur (as mentioned in an earlier
>post). Has Gupta got anything to do with this?
The problem is that none of the photos of the specimen remotely resembles
this figure, which is taken from the original paper by Yadagiri & Ayyasami.
The specimens were not prepared when the paper was written. In lieu of
traveling to India, maybe a plesiosaur expert should take a look at the
photos (not the line drawings) in the paper and see what he or she can come