[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dinosaur counts
In a message dated 96-01-15 12:32:47 EST, swf@ElSegundoCA.ATTGIS.COM (Stan
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Glen J. Kuban )
> > Anyway, since I monitor the C/E controversy and may write on this
> > someday, I thought I would ask here: What does the 775 general count
> > recently posted represent? Is that the number of genera ever
> > named/published?
>Pretty much, yes.
All genera that have ever been referred to Dinosauria or any of its
subgroups. There may be a couple of pareiasaur genera missing, relics of the
brief time during the 19th century when Pareiasauria was incorrectly referred
to Dinosauria. If I come across such genera, I'll issue the usual