[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Parsimony

   Rudy help us, but I've got another parsimony/feather question.

   It was stated that the character state in a cladogram that requires the
fewest steps to evolve is the "correct" one, the most parsimonious.

   BUT, wouldn't evolving feathers in the theropoda require MORE
evolutionary steps than the assumption that feather-things are plesiomorphic
for the dinosauria?  Would not, then, the cladogram that assumes feathers is
plesiomorphic be the most parsimonious, since evolving feathers starting
within the dinosauria would require more steps than if primitive ones were
already present?

** Dinosauria On-Line. Home of THE DINOSTORE ** "Those who trade a        **
** (Dino stuff for sale), Jeff's Journal of  ** little freedom for a      **
** Dinosaur Paleontology, Jeff's Dinosaur    ** little security will soon **
** Picture Gallery, and The DOL Dinosaur     ** find they have none of    **
** Omnipedia. http://www.dinosauria.com      ** either." -- Jeff Poling   **