[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Mongolian dinosaur inspires religion in grad student
In a message dated 96-10-03 17:21:19 EDT, email@example.com (Jonathan R.
Wagner) writes (responding to me):
>> Also, including _Compsognathus_ and therezinosauroids in the same
>> low-level clade is completely absurd. What could >possibly< be the
>> basis for this?
> Aw Jeez. That clade has been the unanimous result of many
> many runs of the dataset. I am analysing the data, but all things
> considered, I'd rather not say right now why this is. Quite
> frankly, I have a little trouble taking your objection seriously
> since you a) believe that therizinosaurs aren't theropods, and b)
> have not provided any evidence to against this (ie. in support of
> another distribution within the clade given (coelurosaurs)).
Well, let this trouble you no longer. Even if therizinosauroids >were<
theropods, I can't see how they could possibly fall into the same low-level
clade with _Compsognathus_. It is difficult to imagine two more dissimilar
dinosaurs! Anyway, I don't want to press the issue, since, as you say, this
is still work in progress.