[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
ANAPSID PHYLOGENY: IRRELEVANT TO DINOSAURS
This message is irrelevant to dinosaurs. I await the heavy hand of
the dreaded MR.
[Dreaded? Who darest dread me? -- MR ]
Adam Yates wrote:
> Scales are definately primitive for the Tetrapoda. They were present in
> the imediate tetrapod outgroups (panderichthyids and other more distant
So what OSTEOLOGICAL reasons are there for seperating m\anapsids
from reptiles, other than it means calling mammals reptiles?