[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Aussie ceratopians

Mark Summer writes:
> If they reported accurately, Protoceratops was in Australia tens of 
> millions of years before previously believed.  I find it hard to 
> believe that this genus, part of a family which shows such explosive
> diversity over a short span, should be stable for longer than the
> space between Protoceratops and Triceratops.

Nope, can't agree with you on this one.  Anatomically _Leptoceratops_ 
is the most primitive known protoceratopsid ("_Archaeoceratops_" 
permitting), but geologically it is among the youngest known 
ceratopsians.  This genus must have remained stable for several 
million years at least.

A _Protoceratops_ from South Australia?  I know of a _Leptoceratops_-
like ulna from Victoria, of late Early Cretaceous age.  (A bit of 
political geography may not go astray: the State of Victoria is 
in _southern_ Australia, to the east of the State of South Autralia.)

Tim Williams