[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Quick cladistics question
Jeff Poling wrote:
> Here's a cladistics question I do not recall ever being addressed:
> Dinosauria is defined as the most recent common ancestor of _Triceratops_
> and modern birds.
(warning: ignorant question ahead)
Is this actually the way the Dinosauria is defined, cladistically? That
looks like a crown-based definition (I think that's the right term),
which makes no sense for a group like Ornithischia which exists only as
fossils. I would have thought that Dinosauria was defined as the first
animal to have the identifying synapomorphies for Dinosauria (whatever
those are) and all its descendants.