[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Cetiosaurus




On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, John R. Hutchinson wrote:

> Hello once more--
> 
>         For the sauropodomorph enthusiasts:
> 
> Is _Cetiosaurus_ still well accepted as a valid taxon? How do the experts
> feel about it's taxonomic status? As far as I know, it's still a happy
> (i.e. monophyletic) taxon.
> 
>                        --John R. Hutchinson



        Aaaah!  *NOT* Cetiosaurus!  AAAAHH!!!  That thing is a mess.  It 
needs help of the Curtice kind, but I have not yet read the dissertation 
written by Upchurch.  I'd say that the group is definitely not 
monophyletic, however...

        BC