[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: "O. mongoliensis"
At 05:53 PM 1/9/96 -0800, you wrote:
>I think that most of you aggree, whith me that Oviraptor mongoliensis is
>very different from O. philoceratops.
>Thats why I came up whith an alternative to a new name yo O.
>"Falsuproalius" mongoliensis or "Falsuperalius" mongoliensis.
>Which means "Mistaken for another from mongolia".
>What do you think?
>Could it have been used?
This taxon is being redescribed as a new genus by paleontologists working on
the type specimen. I do not know yet what the new name will be.
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Vertebrate Paleontologist Webpage: http://www.geol.umd.edu
Dept. of Geology Email:firstname.lastname@example.org
University of Maryland Phone:301-405-4084
College Park, MD 20742 Fax: 301-314-9661
"To trace that life in its manifold changes through past ages to the present
is a ... difficult task, but one from which modern science does not shrink.
In this wide field, every earnest effort will meet with some degree of
success; every year will add new and important facts; and every generation
will bring to light some law, in accordance with which ancient life has been
changed into life as we see it around us to-day."
--O.C. Marsh, Vice Presidential Address, AAAS, August 30, 1877