[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dromaeosaur "sickle" claws
On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, Peter Von Sholly wrote:
> Not to be too nit-picky, but, I said nothing about serrations on the claws.
> Swords, scalpels, razors etc. need sharp edges for cutting, not sharp
> tips. If you ever cut yourself with an x-acto knife or razor, you know
> it's a clean smooth cut. Cat scatches rip and rake and bounce over the
> surface. Yes, they can dig in and tear the skin, but not slice it, in the
> way I would define SLICING. It would seem to me also that "raptor" claws
> are more like cat claws than scalpels. When we get to terms like slash,
> pierce, cut, rip, etc. we need precise definitions if we want to be talking
> about the same things
In which case we ought to simply use the commonly-accepted (in the
forensic pathology milieu) terms for defining wound type: perforation,
laceration, and incision.
Dromaeosaur claws (and, I would suspect, the vast majority of animal
claws) would cause lacerations. I can't think of anything in nature that
would produce something I could call an incision.
(And maybe if some folks object to the term 'sickle-claw', we should adopt
the term 'falciform'.)
xenopathologist at large!
Deathwalker for President: for some *real* health care reform.