[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Th GARBANII



In a message dated 97-12-03 04:57:11 EST, Tetanurae writes:

<< Galton didn't synonymise the two for two reasons.  First, is that there is
substantial skeleton for Bu missing, and it is just plain improper to asign a
head to an animal only known from a leg.  Secondly, and most importantly,
Galton notes that Th garbanii could very well belong to Stygimoloch spinifer
which is also the right size and legless.
  >>

I thought there might have been something like this going on. Thanks for
checking!